Join my FREE business growth workout!

And I'll show you how to grow your business, work less and make more money with proven strategies that work right now...

  • get more clients without cold calling
  • reduce costs, without cutting service
  • know your numbers, without knowing numbers
  • what tools to use to make you more productive
  • Plus much, much more

Get Instant Access To My Free Business Growth Workout

Work With Me

You, Me, Big Results.

Learn More →

Blog

Regularly updated straight from the vine

Learn More →

FREE Resources

Not your average Business Toolbox

Learn More →
Home » Run Your Business

How to manage sickness absence

Today is Monday. Did everyone turn up today?

One of the biggest problems facing any organisation, large or small is the management of staff absence. According the UK’s Health and Safety Executive, in 2006, sickness absence cost the UK economy £12bn.

In small organisations, the cost of sickness absence can be far more than financial. Loss of knowledge, disruption and impact on customer service can all have a major impact on business survival, especially in these challenging times.

How you manage sickness absence is critical to miminsing business disruption. First of all, it is important that everyone understands that it’s not people being off sick that the business has a problem with, it’s the fact that sickness absence creates additional workload for those in the office and sickness absence, especially frequent, short periods are the most disruptive of all.

Secondly, it’s important that you treat everyone equally and with respect. You don’t want staff members with genuine illnesses to think that they are being victimised.

Therefore, it’s important that all employees have a return to work interview following thier period of sickness absence, documenting their reason for absence and clarifying whether there is anything about the workplace which potentially exacerbates the situation. (For example – workload, bullying/harassment etc).

This is only part of the solution.

I am often asked what is the best method for identifying those individuals who are potentially ‘taking advantage’ by having the odd duvet day and distinguishing from those individuals who have a genuine sickness absence.

For example, everyone knows Tom had 1 week off because of swine flu, but does anyone realise that Jane has had 1-2 days every couple of months for the last year?

Here’s how you identify it

In the late 1980’s the University of Bradford’s School of Management conducted research into absenteeism. They developed a metric called the Bradford Factor, although this is often referred to as the Bradford Formula or Bradford Score.

The metric was developed as a way of highlighting the disproportionate level of disruption on an organisation’s performance which can be caused by short-term absence compared to single incidences of prolonged absence.

Bradford Score

The Bradford Factor score (although looks complicated is surprisingly simple) is calculated as follows:

B = S^2 \times D

where:

  • B is the Bradford Factor score
  • S is the total number of spells (occurrences/instances) of absence of an individual over a set period
  • D is the total number of days of absence of that individual over the period

The period is typically a rolling 52 week period.
For example:

  • An individual has 1 instance of absence with a duration of ten days (1 x 1 x 10) = 10 points
  • An individual is off 5 times; each for a period of two days (5 x 5 x 10) = 250 points
  • An individual is off 10 times during the year, for 1 day each time (10 x 10 x 10) = 1000 points

As you can see it quickly identifies the frequent ‘offenders’ and allows you to focus management action on dealing with them.

It is recommended that in your communication to staff about absence, you explain how it’s measured and why you’re doing it. Where you set your Bradford Score be sure not to set the score too low as it may cause resentment from employees who are genuinely ill or may have the reverse effect and encourage individuals to take longer periods of time off to lower their ‘score’!

Management should regularly review the Bradford Scores of their teams. If presented in a descending order, it’s pretty easy to see who are the biggest ‘offenders’.

Typically, I would recommend that a formal investigation interview is held with each person with a Bradford Score over 80 with a view to returning their score to the average within the workplace over the next 3 months.

Any further period of absence in this period should also be followed up and potentially invoking the Company’s capability policy (ie on the basis that they aren’t present and therefore not capable of undertaking their duties).

« Interview: With The...

5 Comments »

  • Peter Sim said:

    In the late 1980’s the University of Bradford’s School of Management conducted research into absenteeism. They developed a metric called the Bradford Factor, although this is often referred to as the Bradford Formula or Bradford Score.

    I’m interested to know what source or evidence you have to support this statement. Was the Bradford Factor really developed at Bradford’s School of Management, or is it an urban legend? When and by whom? Is there any published material from their research?

    The questions above are not meant to be awkward–I genuinely want to know. I’ve been trying to find the origins of the Bradford Factor for more than a year, but without success.

    Peter Sim
    Doctoral Student

    Auckland, New Zealand

    • Matthew Needham said:

      Peter, great comment – I have only seen references to the Bradford School of Managment rather than basing this on a specific paper.. The Bradford Factor (Score) is a tool that I have used for some years to great success.

      I have found this research paper from the Chartered Institute of Personnel Development which may be a good reference document for you and contains a whole number of references.
      http://www.cipd.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/3A208F80-3484-4CE7-B8DD-907FFE660850/0/Wellbeing_sample_chapter_02.pdf

      • Peter Sim said:

        Thanks Matthew

        Interesting–the research paper from CIPD says “the Bradford Factor – so called first during the 1980s because of its supposed connection with Bradford University School of Management.”

        Likewise, Evans and Walters (2002) claim “the ‘Bradford factor’, an approach devised at the University of Bradford” (p. 8). I repeat that more than a year’s research has failed to turn up anything definitive on the exact origins of the Bradford Factor.

        Evans, A., & Walters, M. (2002). From absence to attendance (2nd ed.). London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

        Peter Sim
        Doctoral Student

        Auckland, New Zealand

        • Julia Chisholm said:

          Matthew’s article is spot on.

          When working in a residential school for children with special educational needs, we had a range of staff including admin, maintenance, teachers, therapists and support assistants. Heads of Department were “too busy” to undertake return to work interviews at the time I joined as HR Manager, so I took it upon myself to manage absence.

          I created a formal absence policy and communicated it to Heads of Department. Then, in much the same way that Matthew suggests, I undertook return to work interviews where I explained the Bradford Factor, the reason for using it (e.g. to highlight those will unacceptable absence levels, investigate whether it could be related to health problems, bullying, harassment, “morning after the night before”, other patterns such as immediately before or after holidays.) We used a trigger of 250 for a discussion with the Head Teacher and the following absence may lead to disciplinary action.

          In a 12 month period, Company Sick Pay costs fell from £118k to £56k – a saving that could help support an extra teacher or therapist, purchase additional equipment, an improved IT suite, more trips out for students etc.

          Staff and student productivity was improved, there was less additional burden / stress on other staff and interim costs were greatly reduced.

          Staff actually told me that where they might take the day off if they didn’t feel like going in previously, now that they knew they were being monitored they wouldn’t abuse the sick pay scheme!

          The information is in black and white, can be used at performance appraisal meetings as well as for redundancy or promotion selection. However, it’s important not to discriminate against people with disabilities or certain illnesses that may mean they do tend to have a higher level of absence than others.

          So no published article for you to draw from, just my own experience. Interesting article, Matthew, thanks.

          • Matthew Needham said:

            Thanks Julia for your comments. Sounds like you achieved amazing results. Thanks for sharing your story, it’s really appreciated.

            Matthew